Anyone else finding it ridiculously difficult to build the rank list? I don't know if it's because of the virtual interview format but all programs seem pretty much the same...the only thing that changes is location and name.
I am with you on that. Hence, i think it's important to contribute to the program impression tab. After the advice I got from previous posts, I think i'm leaning towards name, training, current fellow camaraderie, and city (since it's going to be temporary). This helped me differentiate some programs but definitely still having difficulty with others.Anyone else finding it ridiculously difficult to build the rank list? I don't know if it's because of the virtual interview format but all programs seem pretty much the same...the only thing that changes is location and name.
When should we start sending intent emails to programs to let them know we will rank them?
At the end of the day, these programs are trying to sell you on their program. The best way to get information is to ask the fellows; and even then, some fellows might have a different experience than others. So even though the spreadsheet is helpful, I would go with my own impression of the program from interview day/happy hour rather than what the PD’s tell you during their program overview or what I read on the spreadsheet.Anyone interview at Washington Hospital Center for Pulm/ Crit - Can post their opinion
The excel sheet said no weaknesses.
But what did you guys think about Pulm procedures. One of the fellows did mention that they had thoracics and you had to be proactive to get those procedures such as chest tubes..
I think you should first decide if research is or is not important to you. That will help you to initially divide your fellowship options into 2 categories and you can focus on the category important to you first and then the other programs fall into your lower rankings. Most have research but some are research "heavy" and that is a different type of experience from "heavy clinical", again depending on your ultimate plan. I would also consider your interactions with the existing fellows during interviews. How did they seem - happy, unhappy, etc. They will all be tired. But what is the feel you got from them. The team can make or break your time in fellowship. The PD is important, but your time will be spent with your peers and the attendings. Did you like the attendings ?I was wondering if any one has any advice about how to rank. Each program is very different and no program has everything. I have a spectrum of programs I have interviewed at. Some are extremely academic (top 20 in US news) with 18 months of research. Most are mid tier academic programs that are more clinical oriented but opportunities for research. Some have lung transplant at their hospital (which I hear increases procedures), some offer a track with a masters degree (which I would consider doing just to understand how to interpret clinical trials better). Some have IP fellowships (which can give an inside track for sub-fellowship, but may take away procedures).
What do you guys think are the most important things to look for when making a rank list? Is name and being in the top 20 programs super important, even if the clinical training may not be as strong, as it could provide opportunities later? What if you’re leaning towards community practice more? Is it more so clinical training that’s important? Should I base only on location? (I don’t mind moving if I have to). Is having a lung transplant center super important? What about airway management (what if intubations are done by anesthesia)?
would love advice from someone in the field. @Doctor Bob
Super late to the game with this reply but thought it was worth adding this perspective: I have had two programs tell me the opposite. During one of my interview days (mid tier academic program) the PD said to the entire group something to the effect that we are only interviewing applicants that we are excited about having come to our program and it will help if you let us know if you are ranking us highly. It was kind of awkward at the time (and frankly delivered in an off-putting way) but I believe there are programs that adjust their rank list based on applicant communication.This is unnecessary. Anything you tell them (as far as where you plan to rank them) is not viewed with any reliability and no decision is made based off that information. I wouldn't move anyone up or down my list based on how they planned to rank me. I'm their first choice? Great, they're still my 32nd. And if I don't fill by that point they'll get a spot. But I think the other 31 people would be better and someone really wanting to come here doesn't make them a better candidate per se.
Super late to the game with this reply but thought it was worth adding this perspective: I have had two programs tell me the opposite. During one of my interview days (mid tier academic program) the PD said to the entire group something to the effect that we are only interviewing applicants that we are excited about having come to our program and it will help if you let us know if you are ranking us highly. It was kind of awkward at the time (and frankly delivered in an off-putting way) but I believe there are programs that adjust their rank list based on applicant communication.
I think I’m going to be sick. I hate the wait.1 more day everyone!! Good luck!!
Congrats!!! I’m going to NYC too!Congrats to everyone that matched. To unmatched folks , better luck next time. It’s been a hell of a ride. Big Apple here I come!
Good program in terms of the fellow work load, schedule and resident lead teams. Downside is there is tons of polítics in that institution along with a major shift to make it research heavy without offering the resources to fulfill that. Also Morgantown has nothing to offer in terms of a city and its only feat is outdoors stuff (if you are into that) along with it being over an hour from Pittsburgh.Anyone here matched at WVU, Morgantown ?
what happened with rad onc?It will be interesting to see how the fallout of Rad Onc ends up affecting H/O competitiveness... how many people really had a passion for cancer versus people wanting to make high 6 figures working M-F?
If it ends up pushing those previously top applicants into the H/O pathway we may see even more competition in the next 1-3 years or so.
sorry to hear man. but glad we matched. had two friends that didn't match GI.8. Was a little surprised. Apparently 35% didn't match. Only GI was more competitive this year
My bad! Clicked on the wrong forum and though I was in Heme/Onc lolwhat happened with rad onc?
sorry to hear man. but glad we matched. had two friends that didn't match GI.